Recently HG&E applied for an expedited permit from the Army Corps of Engineers to demolish the Texon Building, which it owns. "The building is unstable," said HG&E General Manger James Lavelle.
Meanwhile, town officials have written a letter to the Army Corps objecting to an expedited permit without a renewed commitment from HG&E to restore a significant portion of the historic canal, the first navigable canal in the country. The letter refers to a 2001 agreement on the demolition of the Texon building's boiler house that called for mitigating the loss of the historic building with the creation of a park and restoration of 9,400 square feet (about 300 linear feet) of the old canal.
"We're just trying to get what was laid out in the agreement," said John Hine, chairman of South Hadley's Selectboard.
Town Planner Richard Harris said the company recently proposed restoring a five foot section of the 1795 canal. "That's insulting," said Harris. "The canal is on the National Historic Register and a portion of it should be restored," he said.
The Selectboard has sought to place the issue in the hands of the Army Corps with a second letter, basically asking if the corps to decide what historic mitigation should be undertaken by HG&E if it demolishes the Texon building. The town would abide by the Corps' decision, according to the letter, but HG&E is not willing to make that commitment.
Lavelle said HG&E would be willing to discuss any ruling by the Corps, but would wait to make a commitment until a decision is reached. "We have a fiduciary responsibility to our ratepayers," said Lavelle.
HG&E, if it removes the Texon building at a cost of $700,000, will have spent about $2 million on the riverfront area, including building two parks for which contracts have been signed and work is to begin in the spring. "That building is an eyesore and an impediment to redeveloping the Falls area," Lavelle said. "We think the demolition of the building is mitigation enough," he said.
Town officials say HG&E should simply live up to its prior agreements.
###
